We often figure baby will first say the name of its mother, not its father, but it might say the name of its father and not its mother. Or baby might just say any sound that comes out really easily and the listener will assign the meaning which the baby might have in mind or might not have in mind. We interpret for that baby when it says the first word (and maybe did not mean to be saying any word at all since we have to infer that connection as a basis or foundation for believing we can figure out the meaning).
Baby might not mean anything by that first word. How would we know that? Talk about mind-reading from the proverbial “get go” and then wondering about it for the rest of our (or their) lives. Can I read my child’s mind, or am I really just a hit-and-miss (ham) guesser?
How would I ever know? Especially if I never ask that kid later what that kid meant. Was the kid kidding me, or was I the kidder kidding as the kid that I am?
Such a kidder, you are, I am! 😀
Here is a strange song that is for babies to understand! I might just leave it at this, and never explain anything else. Not that I have ever explained anything. But I believe I tried, and we all know that in the final analysis, what Yoda said was pretty much true, as far as it goes, which is however far you think you can take it:
Do or do not. There is no try.
Do or do not. There is no try. == Horn Into Root Destroyed!
There are others. That is sort of middle-of-the-road. It almost spells HERD but instead is HIRD. That could be someone’s name, but it would not have been my intention to notice it and then avoid it, so it is here simply by “coincidence” and not “purpose” yet I have to go ahead and use it.
That is like excusing myself ahead of time even if I know it “might be” wrong since it could be taken the wrong way and I know it. But I am doing it anyway, with the presumptuous assumtion that I am not intentionally doing anything of any real consequence.
Like as if I insist I have no importance. So then, why not shut up?
[ baby talk — jan and dean — first find one or more “live links” or else post/host it me’sefff!!! ]
Unplayable Sometimes US
[ audio=http://www.owlpages.com/sounds/Bubo-scandiacus-1.mp3,http://www.owlpages.com/sounds/Tyto-multipunctata-1.mp3,http://www.fileden.com/files/2006/8/29/193134/COML%20musical/Jan%20and%20Dean%20-%20Baby%20Talk%20%281959%29.mp3,http://www.owlpages.com/sounds/Tyto-multipunctata-3.mp3|righticonhover=0x33ffcc|rightbghover=0xff3399|righticon=0xcc3399|lefticon=0xcc66ff|rightbg=0x990066|leftbg=0x9933cc|slider=0x993366|border=0xff33cc|loader=0xcc66cc|track=0x663366|text=0x66ccff|bg=0x660066|loop=yes ]
Wild Owls Only WOO
Baby Talk Only BTO
ba. ba-ba ba. (ba) mmm-dap mmm-dap, mmm-wah-wah-wah… which means to say, she loves me!
If I wanted to go hit the storage unit I could get out my 45 of this! Packing 45’s was the musical thing to do, back in the day. What day? What year? This one is 1959, when I was only eight.
All’s Fair In Love And War Ending. (AFILAWE)™
Wander, Invalid Reasoning, Fall (WIRF)™
While AFILAWE is AWE FAIL and also ALE WAIF
and WIRF is whatever smaller you could get?
FRIW, or FWIR, FIR-W, maybe? babblebabble……
Sew+Sue+Me (not sesame)? twisty twisty!
02:38 8/18/2007 (pre-testing so this might disappear, take note!)S
Having not found the source for the first-desired song (Baby Talk) I shall revert to the more familiar tunes. These are arranged two ways. If you started them both at the same time, the second song might slice itself in two. I probably will try that trick. They do not loop, but I might change that, too. In fact, I am apt to try almost anything that happens to seem like it should be the next “right” thing to try! For now, this is it!
triple in seventy-nine tis’n
1 18 54
54 18 1
coming or going, or going or coming, cogogoc?
sinister dizziness agog, you have all you somehow almost wished?
it’s music, and might must be joyful noises!